Figma vs Penpot
Overview
Figma is the dominant browser-based collaborative design tool, recently acquired by Adobe, used by most professional UI/UX teams. Penpot is an open-source design and prototyping platform that also runs in the browser and uses open SVG-based file formats instead of proprietary formats.
Key Differences
- Cost: Figma charges $12–$75/user/month; Penpot is free to use on penpot.app or self-host
- File format: Penpot uses open SVG-based formats; Figma uses a proprietary binary format causing vendor lock-in
- Collaboration: Both support real-time collaboration; Figma's is more polished currently
- Plugin ecosystem: Figma has thousands of plugins; Penpot's library is smaller but growing
- Vendor risk: Adobe's acquisition of Figma (later blocked) highlighted vendor dependency risks
Pricing Comparison
| Aspect | Figma | Penpot |
|---|---|---|
| Base pricing | $12–$75/user/month | Free |
| License | Proprietary | MPL 2.0 |
| Self-hosting | ❌ Not available | ✅ Available |
| Cost at 50 users | ~$600/month | $0/month (self-hosted) |
| Cost at 200 users | ~$2,400/month | $0/month (self-hosted) |
| Vendor lock-in | High | None |
Pros and Cons
Figma
Pros:
- Polished, professionally designed user interface
- Large ecosystem of official integrations
- Managed infrastructure — no server maintenance required
- Enterprise SLA and dedicated support available
- Mobile apps are well-maintained and reliable
Cons:
- Significant per-user monthly cost that scales linearly with team size
- Your data is stored on the vendor's infrastructure
- No ability to inspect or modify the source code
- Feature roadmap controlled entirely by the vendor
- Risk of pricing changes, acquisition, or discontinuation
Penpot
Pros:
- Free to self-host — costs only server infrastructure
- Complete data ownership and privacy control
- Source code is auditable and modifiable
- Active open-source community
- No vendor lock-in or risk of sudden pricing changes
📦 GitHub: penpot/penpot · ⭐ ~33k stars
Cons:
- Requires technical knowledge to self-host and maintain
- May lack some advanced features found in the proprietary version
- Support relies on community forums rather than a paid helpdesk
- UI polish may lag behind the proprietary tool
- You are responsible for updates, backups, and security patches
When to Choose Each
Choose Figma if: Figma is the right choice for professional design teams that need the most polished toolset, the largest plugin ecosystem, and seamless handoff with tools like Zeplin or Storybook.
Choose Penpot if: Penpot is ideal for teams concerned about vendor lock-in, organizations with data privacy requirements, or budget-conscious teams that cannot justify per-seat design tool costs.
Migration Path
Export Figma designs as SVG files, which can be imported into Penpot. Complex components and auto-layout features will require some manual recreation in Penpot's equivalent system.
Data sourced March 2026. Pricing and features change — verify at Figma and Penpot before making decisions.
🔔 Get Weekly Open Source Picks
New tool comparisons, self-hosting guides, and money-saving alternatives — every week. Free.
🔗 Related Comparisons
Found this helpful? Explore all comparisons.
← View All Comparisons